A site for those with an interest in the Order of Buddhist Contemplatives, past or present, and related subjects.
Posts : 1408
Join date : 2009-11-08
Age : 42
|Subject: Assessment by FaithTrust Sat May 07, 2011 1:08 pm|| |
First topic message reminder :
This was received this morning:
Subject: Fw: For the etree please
Received: Saturday, 8 May, 2011, 17:16 p.m.
--- On Fri, 5/6/11, Reverend Helen Cummings <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: Reverend Helen Cummings <email@example.com>
Subject: For the etree please
Date: Friday, May 6, 2011, 5:07 PM
Dear friends, we have posted a Special Announcement from the OBC Steering Group for the Faith Trust Institute (FTI) assessment at Shasta Abbey on our website http://www.shastaabbey.org. You may get the full text through the News and Announcements on the Opening Page or on the News Page.
In gassho. The Prior"
Posts : 206
Join date : 2010-06-11
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:07 pm|| |
Last I heard from FTI was that they were assuming the report (I don't know which "version" of it) was going to be made public. It will be really interesting if they do not release it. Just hearing Lise's account of the hierarchical structure of the OBC's communication and processes is an oppressive reminder of their politics and power structure. I can't believe people can stand it! I'm so very absolutely grateful to be free from that oppression!
Posts : 1638
Join date : 2010-11-17
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:35 pm|| |
Well there is a surprise,I think it was Daishin from Throssel who said in support of JK that she could spot an ego from 100 yards or some distance, I think I can not only spot one at closer distance but can smell a rat too
Posts : 1638
Join date : 2010-11-17
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:13 am|| |
If there have been allegations of a sexual nature then the lay people and innocent vulnerable people must know about it
Posts : 668
Join date : 2010-03-06
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:56 am|| |
- Lise wrote:
- my thoughts - it's a mistake to withhold information from any member of the community.
Lise, I think that you are exactly right, and that this is, in fact, the crux of the matter. (I think that many others have expressed this perception, in various ways, on the Forum as well).
In my perception, RMJK condemned virtually all critiques of her behavior, and any recognition or acknowledgement of her mistakes or shortcomings--out of her personal fear of betrayal, and her fear that she and the OBC might be found lacking in integrity.
In essence: critique = betrayal = a perceived loss of integrity = the worst case scenario-nightmare.
These fears are very understandable--as unhealed existential trauma. I think it likely that we have all experienced them in some form!
The problem arises when we enter into denial. RMJK's denial led to repression, a loss of awareness and, therefore, the inability to heal her own existential trauma back into Awareness itself. Denial sets the fear in concrete. The dynamic became part of her own shadow. And therefore, part of the OBC's shadow as well.
Not surprisingly--denial never works! The denial of shortcomings and mistakes, and an unwillingness to discuss, recognize, acknowledge, or learn from mistakes, inevitably leads to the very conditions of failure that RMJK most feared.
If the OBC chooses to, in effect, suppress the FTI report by withholding it, they will be acting true to form out of fear, and reinforcing the very causal dynamic that creates the problem in the first place.
My conviction is that this trajectory leads to the inevitable demise of the OBC as a credible vehicle for spiritual practice--as a result of preserving a fear-based institutional dynamic that undermines awareness.
The alternative (again, in my opinion), would be for the OBC to accept everything--and relax back into Awareness itself--by fully acknowledging everything that has occurred. This alternative would require the OBC to embody the principles of spiritual practice that it espouses.
This will be scary. It will also be an enormous relief for all currently active members of the OBC. Beyond the occasional drama of her own fear--this is, in fact, what RMJK taught us to do. For the OBC to choose unconditional openness, will exhibit the greatest possible respect and gratitude for RMJK's teaching--and confirm its innate integrity.
It seems to me that the OBC is at a crossroads. I think that the choices made this month, at the Conclave, will likely prove to be critical. I hope that sanity prevails.
Last edited by Kozan on Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:56 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : correcting two misspelled words)
Posts : 190
Join date : 2010-08-26
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:28 am|| |
Me too, Kozan, and very well said. I worry also for the future of the OBC if the leadership fails to do something very brave here. "We did this. We were blind, and cruel, and we sucked at our vocations in some significant ways, and we're very sorry." Heck RM Meian has already said nearly as much. Why do they think any additional apologies and/or restitution will be worse than everyone wondering what was hidden from view?
The senior folks of any organization have to make some decisions that have a broad impact to the whole organization behind closed doors, without having their every word second-guessed. But afterward there should be an opportunity for all of the junior folks to understand the basis of those decisions. In this case, that basis is the report.
Y'know, it occurred to me that the report might contain libelous statements against Mike Little. In that case, releasing the report could subject the OBC to the incredible situation of being sued by its former abbott. Maybe I shouldn't open that can of worms...
Also, it might be that the report summary may contain sufficient detail that even a fairly interested person doesn't feel the need to read the full report. Executive summaries are supposed to contain all of the major points of fact, reasoning, and conclusion of a main document.
But if the senior monks think that there is a good reason to withhold the full report, then at the very least I hope that they give a very thorough public explanation, and provide time for questions.
But (but but but) even that's not going to prevent the report eventually leaking, either at their end or at FTI's. That seems nearly inevitable.
Posts : 1638
Join date : 2010-11-17
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:02 am|| |
when I was told that Gensho had 'Run off with the devil' I did not believe it
When I was told Daiji was 'scared' I did not believe it.
These statements are protecting their position,protecting their view, protecting their opinion.
This is not zazen.
Whereas being open to mistakes admitting mistakes,accepting their situation truthfully is certainly the start of zazen, it is a fundamental part of Soto Zen practice
I do however remain confused with all the name changes of reformed Soto Zen ..to OBC all the different titles whether the actual pure practice of zazen has been left behind too
Posts : 418
Join date : 2010-08-16
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:16 am|| |
Many thanks for your clarity and wisdom of perception in this matter. A truly excellent analysis of the current moment in the history of the OBC.
|Subject: Re: Assessment by FaithTrust || |